By Sudeep Gupta
It’s interesting that Apple has introduced their new iPhone 4 with a subtle change to its name. The previous versions Apple iPhone 3G and 3GS alluded to the generation of the wireless network that the phone supported, while with the fourth generation version does not. Is Apple trying to be sneaky? Trying to get people to think they have bought a “4G” phone, like the HTC Evo 4G? Not necessarily.
First, a little background.
EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA, OMG
The first generation iPhone supported the EDGE data protocol. EDGE stands for “Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution” and is called a 2.5 generation wireless data protocol. It supports a pokey data rate of 236.8 kbps.
Apple followed up with the iPhone 3G, which supported the successor to EDGE called UMTS (“Universal Mobile Telecommunications System”) allowing for a greater data rate as UMTS slightly improved the data rate to 384 kbps. UMTS is considered to be a 3G wireless protocol, so the iPhone 3G name makes sense from that standpoint.
Next came the iPhone 3GS. Among other improvements, it supported High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA), an improvement to UMTS increasing the downlink (base station to handset) up to 15 Mbps. HSDPA is still considered to be a 3G protocol. In fact, some people call it a “3.5G” protocol.
Finally, we have the iPhone 4, which I’ve heard some people erroneously call the “iPhone 4G” (mostly because the previous generation models had “G” in the name). However this confusion about the name makes people think that this is a “4G” phone, but it’s not. The iPhone 4 supports an improved data link protocol: HSUPA, which provides for the same downlink data rate, but improves the uplink (handset to base station) data rate up to 5.76 Mbps. But HSUPA is still considered to be a “3.5G” technology.
Since Apple is not calling it an “iPhone 4G”, they’re not being dishonest, although the name may cause some people to erroneously append a G to the name. Then they will think it supports a true fourth generation wireless data protocol, like the HTC Evo 4G. It turns out the HTC Evo 4G isn’t “4G” either.
The HTC Evo 4G, which supports WiMAX IEEE 802.16e, is not technically a 4G phone either. The confusion comes from what the wireless industry considers to be “4G”. When the 16e standard was first being finalized in 2005, some people called it a “4G” protocol. However, later on the industry consensus is that WiMAX will not be a true “4G” protocol until the next 16m standard. Similarly, some people called the successor to HSUPA called “Long Term Evolution” or LTE 4G, but now the industry has agreed that a 4G version of that protocol won’t exist until its successor LTE Advanced it out, leaving LTE as a “3.9G,” for what that’s worth. The reason is today the industry consensus is that “4G” implies a protocol that can support a data rate of 100 Mbps.
Consumers v. Operators
In the end, this alphabet soup doesn’t really matter to consumers. The reason is because the rules for what the industry considers to be 3G and 4G aren’t really germane for what consumers are looking for. The protocols matter a lot to the wireless operators, who must make significant changes to their network infrastructure to support the evolving protocols. But the “generation” of the wireless data protocol supported by the devices isn’t as important to the consumer as what the device is capable of doing.
